The Human experience
We noted earlier that we humans
are unique in the animal world, having a level of consciousness and awareness
shared by no other creature that walks the earth. In this experience, we are connected to the
world by our senses which act as receptors of information. These then transmit
information to our brains (minds), and this is subsequently interpreted and
utilized by us to our advantage, and thereafter expressed in language; whether by
words or actions.
Although an oversimplification, the
diagram below demonstrates this in pictorial form. Past experiences, native capacity, physical
limitations and disability will all have a varying impact upon our thinking and
response processes. Nevertheless, the diagram is sufficient to show the general
processes in operation and the huge impact that our beliefs have upon us as we
connect and inter-react with the greater world we live in.
The Power of Beliefs
From the simplistic diagram, it
is evident that beliefs are very important. For this part of our analysis, whether
they are true or not is really not important. Beliefs are powerful things in
themselves that affect how we interact with the world, both in words and
actions.
Beliefs are the product of an
education or conditioning process, which includes what we call nurture. They
often spring from experience, which is one reason why governments prefer to select
soldiers while they are young and impressionable. It is evident that this age
group have not yet fully formulated their beliefs, which makes them pliable
enough to bend into the role of tools, by training and indoctrination, often to
do things that they would not normally do.
The manipulation of beliefs can
also be seen in the behaviour of terrorists, where seemingly rational people
will strap explosive devices to their bodies and blow themselves up, as well as
innocent bystanders. Beliefs cause all of us to do most of the things we do day
by day, even in seemingly benign situations. As we said before, beliefs are very
important and have a very powerful affect upon us, as they will influence or direct
most of the choices we make in life.
Beliefs can also produce some very
positive virtues. It is belief that causes a person to show kindness and
compassion to the needy, to put themselves out to assist others, to act
patiently, and do many other noble things.
Beliefs Affect Attitude
Beliefs are chiefly responsible
for our personal attitudes. If we believe we are superior or inferior to another,
it will be displayed in our personal behaviour, or what we have called ‘language’
in the diagram above. In the diagram ‘language’
includes speech as well as body language, and the expression of beliefs by our
actions. Language in this sense is simply the articulation of our beliefs &
attitudes.
Attitude is one of those words
that people sometimes have printed on clothing, usually with the idea that they
have ‘attitude’. This sometimes means they consider their tastes and opinions
as superior. Others suggest that having ‘attitude’ means that they have an
excessively positive view of life. Having ‘attitude’ is often also associated
with answering back, giving cheek and generally not caring what others think of
you. Not a pleasant trait to observe. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that
attitudes are generally the outward manifestation or display of our inward
beliefs.
Interestingly, in many circles,
humility and other ‘Christian virtues’ are now considered a weakness. For
example, among the followers of Ayn Rand, a 20th century thinker and
writer, who based many of her ideas on the writings of Aristotle & the
philosophy of Nietzsche, this appears to be the case. To those who hold to this
world view, the ‘superman’ is moved by both skill and self-interest, and rises
to a position of power and influence in the world.
Many of those now in positions
of power hold versions of this philosophy. Christian virtue, which is based
upon humility and the sacrifice of oneself for the benefit of others, has been
largely replaced by a form of hubris which, at its extremes, often leads to the
sacrifice of others for the benefit of oneself. From this perspective, whether
people are humble, kind, loyal or virtuous is not really relevant. These are
not even considered as reasonable, praiseworthy traits.
These are simply weaknesses
to be rejected and despised, and exploited for personal advantage by the strong.
In this modern ruthlessly
‘Darwinian’ model, the strongest, the wealthiest, the most educated, the most
intelligent, the most selfish, and the most aggressive are the real champions
of the human race and of the world. For they believe that it is only through men
of this type that humanity has progressed. Rand’s philosophy has been very
influential in the business and political world, and some attribute to it the marked
increase in corruption and fraudulent activities of more recent times. While
Rand’s philosophy may, to some degree, describe the world as it is and as it
has been, this does not mean that it is virtuous or praiseworthy. It is rather
a sad indictment upon modern business, political and societal values.
The Philosopher and Economist,
Adam Smith, in ‘The Theory of Moral Sentiments’ (1759), endeavoured to
distinguish between self-interest and selfishness. He concluded that
self-interest was a good and virtuous trait that drives legitimate commercial
activity, and it is to be clearly distinguished from selfishness which he saw
as an evil trait. While there is certainly some truth in this difference, the
difficulty for humanity is that the motives of self-interest and selfishness
are not very far apart. We humans often deceive ourselves, finding moral
justification for our self-centred behaviour in these types of distinctions.
Whether any of these ideas are true and reasonable or not depends upon the
source of your knowledge and beliefs. However, one thing is certain, it is
imposition and assertion of ‘self’
in our personal and communal interactions that is at centre of most of
humanities problems.
Given the clear difficulty of
determining ‘the truth’ of any set of beliefs, it is therefore very important to
ensure that our beliefs are based upon good foundations. But this in itself
poses a challenge. How do we know where to found or base them? What code of
ethics, what source of knowledge and wisdom is going to provide this? Is it the
consensus of human opinion and wisdom? Is it inherited tradition? Is it
cultural bias? Is it the consensus of scientific knowledge and the empirical
method, or is it found in some other source? These are all valid questions that
need to be addressed if we are to live life in a way that totally fulfils the
God ordained human potential and if we are to find ‘The Truth’ about life.
Beliefs – The Challenge of Finding the
Truth
We naturally form our personal
world view, our beliefs, as we grow from children to adults. As the diagram above
shows and as we have considered, these beliefs are often the product of our
upbringing, our education, our peer group, our society, our religion and our culture.
In other words, beliefs are mostly the product of our nurture. All of these
things and more influence us, and work together to form the unique person we
become. In our search for meaning and purpose, we are therefore in danger of
simply being the product of our environment rather than having the active
control and rationality that we like to think we have.
Philosophers and thinkers have
written extensively upon this conundrum, and it is at the base of the ideas
behind relativism. That is, your beliefs will be shaped by your environment,
which is a purely subjective experience. For example, if you were brought up in
a society of cannibals, cannibalism would be your normality. Killing and eating
a person would pose little or no moral conflict to your belief system. Your
normality would know no conflict.
Likewise, if we were raised in a
different religion; Jewish, Christian, Islamic, Hindu, or Buddhist, or are
culturally different; Western, Middle Eastern, Eastern or African, then our values
and beliefs would be affected and subconsciously directed by our environment to
a larger degree than we sometimes imagine, as would our understanding of what
is normal.
In this regard, the message of
the Bible is that originally all men knew God and His ways, but over time they
moved further and further away from Him. They changed their beliefs and
customs, and introduced concepts and morally degenerate practices that did not
originate with God. Paul says of these, ‘who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and
worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed
forever. Amen. For this reason God gave them up to vile passions’ (Read Rom.1:21-28).
The sad history of humanity is
full of examples like this. Over thousands of years civilisations have arisen,
prospered and eventually passed off the scene. The ruins of these are in
evidence everywhere. In these places men and women have lived and died, and had
all the same joys, aspirations and fears that we have today. Yet most lived and
died in general ignorance of the things of God. No doubt in these places men
had laws and customs, religions and philosophies that the people lived and died
by. Some were brave, some fearful, some law abiding and some not, but in the
end and in the greater scheme of things, their experiences really amounted to little.
They simply lived and died in vanity and in general ignorance of God (Acts.14:16-17, Isaiah.2:17-22, Jer.3:17).
Paul calls
this ‘the times of this ignorance’
at which God ‘blinked’, that is, He overlooked
or ignored it. The Christian dispensation marked a change, for after the resurrection
of Jesus, the gospel was sent forth to all people, not just Israelites, and
Paul states that now God now commands
all men everywhere to repent (Acts.17:30).
No longer was the truth of God tied exclusively to the nation of Israel, and
submission to the Law of Moses.
Understanding these things brings
us to the challenge of sorting through human experiences and prejudices in our
quest for the truth of God and for true purpose. Below is another simple diagram
that seeks to portray these things in a different way. We will call it the TTT
triangle. If we are completely honest with ourselves, each of us could roughly
determine where we fit into this arrangement. What influences us the most, is
it Truth, Tradition or Taste? Oftentimes what we imagine to be the ‘Truth’ may
rather be the inherited ‘Traditions’ we have received.
So often in our search for truth
and purpose, we are waylaid by ‘personal taste’ and ‘corporate or group
tradition’. That is, what we think is truth may simply be our personal
preferences or, if we are part of a group it may simply be the group’s
traditional position. This is the type of ‘relativism’ that the philosophers
speak of. They were well aware of this tendency and noted that the differences
between both individuals and societies were often simply the product of an
individual’s life experiences, which are heavily affected by one’s environment.
Truth and purpose in these circumstances is simply relative.
We also need to be on guard
against the subtle power and influence of subjective thoughts and thinking.
Many religious philosophies leverage off our unique consciousness and
self-awareness, and end up with some form of ‘Existentialist’ philosophy, where
‘enlightenment’ is said to be found from exploring our own mind-body
experience. This is commonly found in some Eastern religions, and has crept
into various ‘Christian’ groups as well. We do well to heed the words of the
Prophets - Jer.10:18. ‘O LORD, I know the way of man is not in
himself; It is not in man who walks to direct his own steps’, and of
the Apostles - Rom.7:18. ‘For I know that in me (that is, in my
flesh) nothing good dwells’.
Therefore, if we are to really
find ‘the truth’ about life, we will need to be aware of the subtle and
powerful influences that all these things can have upon us. Many of these
things operate at the subconscious level, and it takes a great deal of honest
mental effort to see beyond them.
We will face these same
challenges when we come to read the Bible. We all have a natural bias, which is
called normalcy bias, to interpret the words we read according to our
‘tradition’ or our personal ‘taste’. By using this approach we will end up only
finding ‘affirmations’ that confirm our pre-existing position and beliefs. It
is very difficult for a person to see beyond their natural and acquired
prejudices. The cognitive dissonance created by the experience will work
against us, and limit our ability to really hear what is being said.
The process that we naturally
follow can be likened to pouring a liquid into a mould. No matter how we go
about it, we will always produce the result that is predetermined by our
beliefs. We rarely challenge our beliefs, as it is natural for all of us to
think that we understand and that we are always being perfectly honest.
In the diagram below, the mould
is like the model or world view that we have already acquired. As a
consequence, the outcome of our efforts will always produce the same results.
It takes great effort, courage and honesty to really question whether the model
we have already accepted is truthful, and in accordance with that which is
presented in the Bible. This was the same challenge that the Jews stumbled with
in the days of Jesus.
No comments:
Post a Comment